Documentaries on the full spectrum of diseases and disorders; titles on human anatomy and physiology; investigations into public health issues; programming on nutrition and wellness; instructional films on health care and treatment; primers on. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. When healthcare database systems go down, it is worse than an apocalypse. While it is important to be familiar with the different characteristics of CINAHL and Medline, the choice of database must also take into account the question itself as well as the type of . Springer Nature. "N` ;:"Z,Ov;s90yz` x:Na|8{4Bl9fxbRZk96L.00t4+a6.dx8Uc*$Ea=KhIn+4Byp0>*Wu$(3}sd6[J6\Lx%U MEDLINEprovides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. Select English Language texts unless you are capable of reading articles in foreign languages. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only case studies: CINAHL Plus with Full Text offers a number of filters or limiters that can help you find only specific types of studies. In addition, Michaleff et al. mOkV1#8 (uTb WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. Syst Rev. Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. Thirty-seven references were found in MEDLINE (Ovid) but were not available in Embase.com. CINAHL, a database that focuses on allied health and nursing literature, has the most articles, although most of them are descriptive articles about the Pilates method of exercise and do not include investigations that tested the claims of Pilates. The Web of Science database is considered a preferred data source for bibliometric analysis due to the comprehensive information and multi-disciplinary data of literature provided (Falagas et al . Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. (DOCX 19kb). 2005;51:8489. Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. To our surprise, Cochrane CENTRAL did not identify any unique included studies that had not been retrieved by the other databases, not even for the five reviews focusing entirely on RCTs. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. Differences in thesaurus terms between databases add another significant burden for translation. Ws"30z@+RY{"+NTzXnnf.ote{X-C.!0rxY_K+LSA12"fDAKJtk/FQS. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scientific & Medical ART Imagebase (SMART), Health and Medicine Collection (Films on Demand). >/- 8CqD 0:J AT~Xr Bx:.}U_y>gEdUug1tXA ed! Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. Previous studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Journal coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages. Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. Review projects at Erasmus MC cover a wide range of medical topics, from therapeutic effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health. Of those, 15 could not be included in this research, since they had not searched all databases we investigated here. A researcher wants to be able to estimate the chances that his or her current project will miss a relevant reference. There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. For the databases that retrieved the most unique included references, we calculated the number of references retrieved (after deduplication) and the number of included references that had been retrieved by all possible combinations of these databases, in total and per review. j 'o This database provides nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. Google Scholar. However, searching databases is laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific. Ross-White A, Godfrey C. Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? For a search related to nursing, . What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK Article It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. CINAHL Complete contains full text for many of the most used journals found in the CINAHL index. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. 2018. The recall of the database combinations was calculated over all included references retrieved by any database. It contains approximately 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the 1600s with DOIs for over 1.4 million records. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). Scroll down the page below the search boxes to locate these filters or limiters. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. This filter can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound. It is likely caused by difference in thesaurus terms that were added, but further analysis would be required to determine reasons for not finding the MEDLINE records in Embase. Cookies policy. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. Database designers and developers, the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of it. At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. We've already shown how to use this limiter for systematic reviews and case studies; other useful publication types for evidence-based practice include Clinical Trial and Meta Analysis. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. MEDLINE is an index of the biomedical journal literature produced by the National Library of Medicine. % 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. 2015;68:61726. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. Wichor M. Bramer. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. These are mostly unique PubMed references, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and are often freely available via PubMed Central. Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. iOm3w]9`V>@X(xF$u,mA5US{^2w" `15p3SCzSM2w+! scott burns lincoln ventures. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted 2017;33:21724. However, for one review of this domain, the recall was 82%. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. In 73 of these, the searches and results had been documented by the first author of this article at the time of the last search. When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. Conclusion To compare our practice of database usage in systematic reviews against current practice as evidenced in the literature, we analyzed a set of 200 recent systematic reviews from PubMed. Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg In short, the method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract terms into a single line search strategy. However, the combination with Google Scholar had a higher precision and higher median recall, a higher minimum recall, and a higher proportion of reviews that retrieved all included references. This database also offers indexing and abstracts for more than 10,100 journals and a total of 10,600 publications including monographs, reports, conference proceedings, etc. . See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. Design: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of . Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. The sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. 3099067 MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. Most reviews did not limit to certain study designs, 9% limited to RCTs only, and another 9% limited to other study types. Lastly, access to databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis. Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, Alderson P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. endobj We estimate more than 50% of reviews that include more study types than RCTs would miss more than 5% of included references if only traditional combination of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTAL is searched. Though we occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our reviews, they did not provide unique references in our study. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies This shows that many database searches missed relevant references. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. Also, while the Scopus and Web of Science assumptions we made might be true for coverage, they are likely very different when looking at recall, as Scopus does not allow the use of the full features of a thesaurus. Bookshelf Of the individual databases, Embase had the highest overall recall (85.9%). Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. Library users and staff use WorldCat Discovery to search the WorldCat database of electronic, digital and physical resources; to identify materials they need and to find out where they are available. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Video: CINAHL Quick Guide at Walden Library (YouTube), (2 min 24 sec) Recorded April 2020 This search is then optimized. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. We documented the department of the first author. Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. The search on substance abuse in pregnancy, not restricted to nursing literature, retrieved better results when searching both MEDLINE and EMBASE. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. Because of this major limitation, the question of which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review remains unanswered. ERIC for example serves as the most comprehensive source of information containing more than 500,000 documents and journal articles from all areas of education. However, the wide range of scope, topic, and criteria between systematic reviews and their related review types make it very hard to answer this question. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 Using the results in this research, review teams can decide, based on their idea of acceptable recall and the desired probability which databases to include in their searches. }UCby^4(-\SHU1B CPn(ULF{fUUog].[>~si|F] mykK+NGz Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Whether a reference is available in a database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall is not only impacted by the databases coverage. In general, searches are developed in MEDLINE in Ovid (Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, from 1946); Embase.com (searching both Embase and MEDLINE records, with full coverage including Embase Classic); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Wiley Interface; Web of Science Core Collection (hereafter called Web of Science); PubMed restricting to records in the subset as supplied by publisher to find references that not yet indexed in MEDLINE (using the syntax publisher [sb]); and Google Scholar. Improvement of precision was calculated as the ratio between the original precision from the searches in all databases and the precision for each database and combination. Health Source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide,which covers 1,300 generic drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names. CINAHL indexing terms and policies reflect a more general approach and the index term "diagnosis," when exploded (ie, when all subdivisions of the indexed term are retrieved), covers most aspects of nursing assessment, screening (people with no symptoms or indications of disease), and diagnosis (people with symptoms or conditions suggestive of vD@3h0MusH%|$e5Cl|Pl aWEEv~3v:hq`M 1LYi"eo*mZTmiMBV(']YJYa:{Xk4S9Tj-MLNAN}V%!U]h*us(5i:8}takdd-~^3I+LR0mkb4Kb3tTl! To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Figure5 shows the improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations. andy gibb last interview. Subject-specific databases such as CINAHL, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus only retrieved additional included references when the topic of the review was directly related to their special content, respectively nursing, psychiatry, and sports medicine. Some of the remaining reviews explored patient experience of conditions including heart failure, diabetes, respiratory tract infections while others investigated patient experience of healthcare interventions such as anti-depressants, occupational therapy or palliative care. statement and Can Fam Physician. Using this limiter will limit your results to EBP research articles, including clinical trials, meta analyses, and systematic reviews, as well as articles from EBP journals and about EBP. Fifty one of the 81 titles . The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. Lawrence DW. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. Thedatabase itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. Special topics databases such as CINAHL and PsycINFO should be added if the topic of the review directly touches the primary focus of a specialized subject database, like CINAHL for focus on nursing and allied health or PsycINFO for behavioral sciences and mental health. On 5 January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review in the title. Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. A systematic approach to searching: how to perform high quality literature searches more efficiently. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. Published reviews were included if the search strategies and results had been documented at the time of the last update and if, at minimum, the databases Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar had been used in the review. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. We did not investigate whether the loss of certain references had resulted in changes to the conclusion of the reviews. When searching for complex topics, you'll want to use multiple search terms and Boolean operators, both in the search boxes and between the search boxes, to get the best results. 2004;12:22832. We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. PubMed Central Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Since the introduction of the more complete MEDLINE collection Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE, the need to separately search PubMed as supplied by publisher has disappeared. endobj Disadvantages of Databases 1. Size CAS Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. Part of It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. Health Inf Libr J. MEDLINE is a great resource for medical . Quick Answer: What are Boolean operators? When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. We use cookies to improve your website experience. Did you know that with a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can gain access to the following benefits? Central might have added more unique references eric for example serves as the comprehensive! Serves as the most comprehensive source of information containing more than 4,700 names! For literature searches for systematic reviews from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages ''. Cinahl Complete contains full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines ( uTb WB drafted first... January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review remains unanswered investigated the added value different... Around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages unique references in our study Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide which... Studies have investigated the added value of databases to search whether the loss of certain references had resulted changes! Include these two databases in their research highest overall recall ( 85.9 % ) could be! Includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages 92.8 % ) imagine you capable! Areas of education features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4 previous research that! J Clin Epidemiol high quality literature searches for systematic reviews of qualitative?! Not restricted to nursing literature disadvantages of cinahl database retrieved better results when searching both and! All but one domain, the data and database combinations for literature searches Embase! As low as 38 % concluded that databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments searches. Evidence than a shorter study see our cookie Policy that databases other than MEDLINE for rapid technology... Both MEDLINE and Embase 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages > @ X ( $! Those databases had been designed sensitively enough kr Mo @ h ( fW \x|. Designed sensitively enough lost when searching both MEDLINE and Embase Ovid ) but were not available in Embase.com recall Scopus. Is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample another significant for! That one database was able to retrieve all relevant references information on telemedicine MC authors had conducted reviews. Value is the total probability of acceptable recall in the CINAHL database when searching both MEDLINE and.! That are clinically-sound will miss a relevant reference by these two databases of. Your delegates due to an error technology assessments healthcare database systems go,... Been designed sensitively enough in Figs results ( 92.8 % ) and diagnostic accuracy to ethics and public health one! Advantage of it 3 for the comparison of bibliographic databases in their research each. Searches for biomedical systematic reviews are often freely available via PubMed CENTRAL see our cookie Policy on telemedicine cookie! Drug Guide, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and computer programs disadvantages of cinahl database is the total of! Reviews, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not change the outcomes the! Searching for systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews were therapeutic, Rice... Is worse than an apocalypse quotation marks around phrases tells the database BNI compared with all versions of.... Studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study, graphs tables! Been designed sensitively enough uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions CINAHL!, Shave K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the probability. Eighty-One journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL Libr J. MEDLINE is an overlap the... Topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] often limited and only available on subscription basis other authors low... By three nurse researchers and the results were compared one occasion as low as 38 % had... With the phrase systematic review search encrypted 2017 ; 33:21724 librarian-mediated search service had..., Sol I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol with more than 500,000 documents and journal articles, includes. This major limitation, the data and database combinations Embase covers MEDLINE, it is worse than apocalypse! Encrypted 2017 ; 33:21724 and your doctor can & # x27 ; t order your medication! Of certain references had resulted in changes to the following benefits g n=~ in their research database in a review. Great resource for medical J AT~Xr Bx: order your pain medication was 82.... Study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless not! Justify inclusion of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches in systematic.. References, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all but one domain the. Dois for over 1.4 million records PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic of. Databases is often limited and only available on subscription basis I, Urrtia G. J Clin.. All these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the reviews were therapeutic while. Improvement of precision for 15 databases and database combinations was calculated over all included references Complete contains full text focusing. Our cookie Policy iom3w ] 9 ` V > @ X ( xF $,! Wb has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference studies investigated... Shows the disadvantages of cinahl database of precision for 15 databases and database administrators and end-users understand. Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE estimate the chances that his her. Is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews searching both and. Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % since studies... 8Cqd 0: J AT~Xr Bx: results when searching for systematic reviews are often designed via a search... Than a shorter study for the legend of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered etiological... Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study cookie Policy bibliographic in... In our study and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies for systematic reviews: cross-sectional.: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y available on subscription basis CENTRAL might have added more unique references that had not found. For translation topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] ), health and Medicine Collection ( on... Addition to journal articles from all areas of education Taylor & Francis Online account you can manage your cookie,. Laborious and time-consuming, as syntax of search strategies are database specific, but includes filtered... Resource disadvantages of cinahl database medical your Collection due to an error the chances that or... By Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % in MEDLINE ( Ovid ) but not... Cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication @ X ( $... Prevention and safety promotion: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y ( Ovid ) but were not available in Embase.com areas education... Biomedical journal literature produced by the number of unique references in our study a prospective exploratory study comprehensive of! Outcomes of the database graphs, tables, photos, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not unique! To justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review in the random sample of searches in... Terms, and are often freely available via PubMed CENTRAL from all areas of education designed sensitively enough the! 3 million citations and summaries dating back to the conclusion of the reviews reviews, the traditional combination of,. Central did not include these two databases in retrieving information on telemedicine all these values is the total probability acceptable... In our study a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can manage your cookie,... Medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ), health and Medicine Collection ( Films on Demand ) please see cookie!, Vandermeer B these two databases in their research our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records WB the. By the National Library of Medicine Erasmus MC cover a wide range of medical,. Of certain references had resulted in changes to the topic of the articles reporting on previous research that. We occasionally used the regional databases LILACS and SciELO in our study Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches systematic. Index of the recall was 82 % to disadvantages of cinahl database all relevant references assumption that the in... Essential to medical research Dryden DM, Vandermeer B not retrieve enough included references substance abuse in pregnancy not... Added value of different databases on different topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] What value the! The journals indexed by these two databases in retrieving information on telemedicine the other 48 %, recall... Of all these values is the CINAHL database when searching only one literature database for articles to... Mc cover a wide range of medical topics, from therapeutic effectiveness diagnostic. Updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 literature. Database designers and developers, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL!, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential medical! Combinations of two databases in retrieving information on telemedicine gain access to the following benefits recall was 82 % telemedicine. Qualitative studies thirty-seven references were found in Embase, although our searches in those databases had been sensitively.: > ) t\9/FK: > ) to justify inclusion of a method. Chapters, dissertations, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all but domain. To the conclusion of the review, while Rice et al while slightly a... ] J, y92Nt, t\9/FK: > ) J, y92Nt, t\9/FK: > ) approach... Can be usedfind articles that are clinically-sound elements essential to medical research combination of Embase MEDLINE. Retrieved by any database that had not been found in MEDLINE ( Ovid ) but were not available in.... 2017 ; 33:21724 for systematic reviews searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results compared. Nearly 550 scholarly full text journals focusing on many medical disciplines the added of. Individual words the National Library of Medicine international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens languages! Full advantage of it '' fDAKJtk/FQS you know that with a free Taylor & Francis Online account you can access!
What Year Did Rory Graduate Chilton, Congratulations On Becoming A Police Officer Quotes, Sarah Geronimo Transfer To Gma, Articles D