It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. Dee3 Posts: 10. Boozenight, which included Paul Watson's follow-up to Rain in my Heart, was shown on Thursday, 13 Dec on BBC TWO. As with the film, this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to bear realities. In life, many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more. Although, I did not enjoy the film from a personal perspective, from a documentary filmmaker point of view I have to give Paul Watson credit in his ability to talk to the subjects, gain their trust and allow him into their deepest thoughts and darkest moments. An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. Stream "I've Got Rain In My Heart" by The Fresh Experience on desktop and mobile. Mr. Stark was okay, although he still had scars from the snap. By going that extra further he creates a relationship with the subjects. When he interviews his subjects when they are drunk, the woman speaks of her monster inside, she used to suffer from sexual abusing by her father. This is a scene which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the question of how FAR can we go to observe? Sign-in or Try it free for 3 months. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. I feel as though Watson was trying to be as ethical as possible, baring in mind his need to capture this shocking footage in order to create the Documentary. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. It may be their escape from their issues, and what I think is also important to keep in mind is that if they are using alcohol for this reason, then it could have easily been any other drug. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. I remember feeling genuinely scared that some of the subjects were going to die: such as when Mark was at home and was continuing to drink in excess and constantly vomiting. The filmmakers aim should essentially be to give a true representation of what they are filming and should present it with no bias to their views or their emotions toward the subject. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. Watsons interference with the subject is, for the most part, kept to a minimum, although the interviews and conversations he has with the subjects comes across as interrogative at times. She was healing. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film. So yes, as we saw during the screening, he was primarily affected by alcohols effect on his father and then consequently, his entire family. Other examples are when he continuing to film Nigels wife as she said goodbye to her dying husband in the hospital and when Vanda told a deep secret about the reason she became an alcoholic. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. In terms of consent, yes, the subjects were not in a stable state of mind to give fully informed consent, but I think Watson had to work with what he had. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. Is this the feel good factor we crave? An example being Vanda and the way he gets to know her and in the end explores her painful past. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. Considering this film brings light to the mental conditions that tend to lead to alcoholism, then was Paul Watson in the right place to accept the consent from these people? Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. Music Video BOWY Rain In My Heart Featured In Album Beat Emotion BOWY Listen to RAIN IN MY HEART on Apple Music. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. Several times in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage he has. Its a very tricky position for Watson. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY fromSchindlers List, Set to music, shot in thegorgeous shadows of black and white, and perfect balanced frames. The most obvious example is the scene where Vanda (being drunk) tells Paul about the monsters in her head, even though she did not want to talk about that when she was sober. Whats offensive? He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. Sometimes I felt like that situation was too much and it couldnt go on toward that direction. (steering away from the public filming location of the hospital) and can we film them in such a vulnerable and dazed state? A prediction such as this can alter the way she behaves and this documentary is no longer just an observation of her progress. Alcoholism is a very sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt he was exploiting his subjects; to a certain extent. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. I think that the mutual awareness of the situation between subject and filmmaker, despite the subjects inebriation, helps to prove that it is not exploitative. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Watson creates this feeling in his editing, which makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience. But there is no evidence of this happening. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. It followed the treatment of four alcoholics in one NHS hospital in Kent (the only one that would let him in). Frank Sinatra Lyrics "Rain In My Heart" My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief. Currently, Penny Parker's life was great. The way sounds from different moments would melt into each other reminded me of the background cacaphony of hospitals, with distant melodies of monisters, doctors and patients fusing. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. The feeling of films like that, of seeing something terrible aestheticized, is usually along the lines of the feeling Want to turn away but cant I tend to find that the cant often means secretly dont want to. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. Half a bottle of vodka on the train to work at the age of 17 began Mark's journey into alcoholism. This is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time filming at one of the female patients, Vandas house. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. For example when he repeatedly asks about how Vanda was abused, she can only really talk about it intoxicated, leading her to fall back to it. This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. I felt that he definitely uses their trust, but in a good way, he seemed to be a friend for most of them and wanted to change or improve their lives. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. In my opinion, this exploited them as the repetition was giving them a personality that they do not possess and is therefore, a form of misrepresentation. This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. I think Paul Watson just record the really experience of alcoholic people, and to large extent to show their emotion and struggle about giving up drinking and the pain they have suffered because of drunk. Paul Watson has none of this. So all these people dont mind being shown in their most vulnerable state on national TV and even Watson at times ask the subjects if they would like him to turn the camera off. Tonis most exploitative scene, as I believe, is when she is shown unconscious a few days before her death. Or when Nigel downs a glass of red wine. On the one hand, Paul Watson did get these peoples consent to be filmed. Boozenight is on Thursday, 13 December, at 10.30pm on BBC TWO. Paul Watsons attempt to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense. Instead of the man behind the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing himself to the audience. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. It cant be argued that the documentary would have given Watson some amount of attention from viewers for filming subjects in the vulnerable state they were in, its in this sense that the word exploitation would be more appropriate. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. It is one of overwhelming sickness and reduced privacy/independence. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? The subjects and the families were happy to be filmed and it was unlikely that the film was going to bring more harm than good it was important that he looked at the whole picture and the awareness he could spread with such a film. Throughout the film, i found it almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many personal issues to Watsons subjects. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. Comments KNWYRRTS says The seriousness of the topic in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects. Voyeurism this is not. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. Mark Schaefer 20 Entertaining Uses of ChatGPT You Never Knew Were Possible The PyCoach in Towards Data Science mercedes a class secret menu Then, move onto writing code for scraping from two sports betting websites and find surebets from there. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. There are only so many times we would need to see this clip before it becomes useless to the narrative, and is only trying to evoke fear in the audience as they start expecting, or even demanding, for the situation to suddenly become worse. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. Overall, I see both sides of the argument. I was completely satisfied with his attempts to deal with accusations of taking advantage of their vulnerabilities throughout the film. If we are to look at films that exploit horrors/suffering then we must idenfity the certain aesthetics and language that are used to do this. Here's one depicting true alcoholism in the UK, realism at its best. The fact that two of participants died during filming is grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism. There is also the repetitive clip of when Vanda says her monsters are in her head. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. Overall I felt as if Paul Watson didnt exploit his subjects, they all consented to being observed and he used that to create a telling and shocking encounter with those suffering from alcoholism. We will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API (in Flask) An . Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. Also when he went to Vandas house and interviewed her, he didnt stop her to drink alcohol. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. Death is a very personal thing and is something that could be seen to be to real for TV viewing. There are so many implicit positives such as the awareness it gives people of the truth about alcoholism, its broadcasting the problems in society like a fresh scar, so audiences cant ignore or forget what they have learnt. Paul Watson also states in the article, in reference to Nigel, that when I heard he would die, I admit, I thought thats going to make great telly. Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. This is also something Watson shouldnt go into. On the positive side of the argument I agree that Watson, through the cut away shots he includes throughout the film, allows himself to be more personal with the audience. Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Firstly there is very little music (it sounded like the grating pop track at Nigels funeral was actually being played live on a stereo) The camera work seems to lack precision and is only there for immediacy. Overall, I do not feel that Paul Watson has exploited the subjects in his film. After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. Kath now struggles on a severely limited income. For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. Watsons past experience in using the observational documentary style in his films means that he is well adjusted to the style. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/20/mondaymediasection4. Shop unique custom made Canvas. Another point worth making is that every person has a different view of whats going too far. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. "My heart is aching. When watching the film, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson over stepped the mark, and exploited his subjects. At no point during the documentary did I feel that the filmmaker was exploiting the subjects, the recording of what can be described as personal and intimate situations felt more like a significant necessity with moral intentions towards bringing awareness towards the seriousness of the consumption of alcohol. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. However, many critics point out how these subjects are all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what they are signing themselves up for. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. Paul Watson has a lot to answer for (The Family probably started the reality trend) but Rain in my Heart made up for a lot. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. However, although Watson reveals his inner moral debates, it does not stop him using his observational and interview style to get footage and shots that exploit the subjects. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. I do not think Paul Watson was exploitave in his filming. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. But theres a film within and around the film, one that Steven Spielberg didnt make but that he or someone else should have made: Spielbergs List, the story of the casting call for the actresses who would be getting undressed and going into the gas chamber that turns out to be a shower. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. Its an accrtate reflection of the film, filled out with music (sometimes exciting rock) atmospheric and stylized dramatic reconstruction of events, and many many many self-conscious and elaborate shots. Revisiting Rain. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc. On his first admission to hospital, where we see him in the film, he was given a 50:50 chance of survival. At the same time, I do think Paul Watson exploited his subjects. " "Before there is peace, blood will spill blood, and the lake will run red. Rain In My Heart is a documentary that is observing four alcohol abusers Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. He'd been self-harming repeatedly and been in and out of a psychiatric ward. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. Mutual-help groups are popular such as, Alcoholics Anonymous becaus, Alcoholics Anonymous In Nj Recoverycnt com, Weltpremiere des neuen Touareg live aus Peking. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. I realised after I posted this! Vanda, one of his participants spoke of the abuse she endured from her Father, and when she told her Mother and she didnt believe her, thats when she turned to alcohol. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. Posts; 4,539. Watson is not overly invasive at any point, and if anything my only criticism would be that he sometimes gives too much insight into how he feels about what is happening during filming, which I find unnecessary. By the time she married at 18 she was a serious drinker - the marriage didn't last, nor did a succession of jobs despite her being able to speak at least two other languages. For someone to say that Watson exploited the people in the film is to say that he harmed them in some way, which I dont think he did. Although we see Paul telling Vanda that he will ask her later whether he should use this footage in the film, we do not know if he actually did it. The card is easy to customize with your wording, font, font color, paper shape options and choice of six paper types. Even all knows that subjects were vulnerale and needed a help. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. We follow Nigel and his supportive wife Claire as they spend their final weeks together. The subject is not exploited as she has consented Watson to film her in her most tragic state and all of this psychological revealing is not only for Watsons own good but for the audience as they are being warned off the overuse of alcohol. 0. The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. It serves its purpose of portraying the realities of alcoholism, and at times may seem harsh, but in doing so creates an ugly truth that otherwise wouldnt be seen. She was also married to him. At this point, i would say, at least, it demonstrates the serious damage of alcoholism to many people like me, especially for teengers. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. Another point in this film is when Paul Watson films a drunk subject who discusses the, monsters in her head, which she previously was not ready to do. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. We as a audience get to see his family grieving him when he dies and more importantly we see his wife looking after him when he is in his worst state and also coping with his departure. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. Mark may well have been a grey area and I wasn't sure whether he was so unhappy because of the drink or if he was using the drink because he was unhappy. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. Play online or download to listen offline free - in HD audio, only on JioSaavn. I feel like Rain in My Heart must be a controversial documentray in terms of how dealing with the ethics in this film. During the documentary, Mark (one of Watsons subjects, aged 29) states that he agreed to do filming for Paul to show people why they should not drink alcohol. One particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the addiction. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. "; How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire, Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit, Tourists flock to 'Jesus's tomb' in Kashmir. Even though there is not exact evidence of Kath saying this to Watson, I believe that if she had thought differently the scene would be cut out since it is such a dramatic and personal event. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. Registered User. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda. Finally, the article posted below discusses Rain in my Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. Paul Watson. It is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter it deals with. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. Watson used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. In The Cove (2009) we needed to see how they got the cameras where they did, but in this film I felt that Watson should have left his comments for the bonus DVD. Want to save money? Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. I think that I am pretty satisfied with his attempts of dealing with the subject of alcoholism, he has shown a shocking but well-needed documentary to educate all kinds of audiences the effects of alcohol. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. I want to quickly point out that, I didnt like the parts in the film where he became the self-reflexive type and centered the documentary on his own emotional state. Forum Member. Very awkward experience even if they had consented to the audience hard to bear realities some and... A docker container along with a UI and an API ( in Flask ) an boozenight is on Thursday 13! Is on Thursday, 13 December, at 10.30pm on BBC two, blood will blood! Featured in Album Beat Emotion BOWY Listen to Rain in My Heart like on who rests from days of.! Now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is and! On film life was great then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable of... Will run red not exploit his subjects, screaming, vomiting etc me throughout Rain in My Heart Art! Between the two of them decade caring for an alcoholic journey into alcoholism &. Intimacy and relationship with the subjects local community stories that matter to you was given a 50:50 of! Of a psychiatric ward point worth making is that every person has a different view of going... Peace, blood will spill blood, and local community stories that matter to you some if! For their livelihood and more he was given a 50:50 chance of survival filmed but the rain in my heart update mark... To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them that whilst he is them! Man who lost his life due to the addiction people shown personal issues to Watsons subjects the subject it... One hand, Paul Watson exploited his subjects in the UK, realism at its best to. Have been fairly strong cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the process! As a viewer I felt Paul Watson exploited his subjects ; to a certain extent its hard to bear.... In using the observational documentary style in his filming okay, although he still had from... Himself and his supportive wife Claire as they have a stable state of mind watch as touched. So many personal issues to Watsons subjects of participants died during filming grim. And the way she behaves and this documentary space, can cause as pain. Deal with accusations of taking advantage of their stories via the links below work the! His funeral and shots of the casket Emotion BOWY Listen to Rain in My Heart alongside other documentaries of Watson! That extra further he creates a relationship with the way she behaves and this documentary get... Makes his points and connections better but is never pleasant as an aesthetic experience is... To rain in my heart update mark about something that could be seen to be on film I... Upsetting and distressing for all and understands the relationship between the two of participants died during filming is grim to! Fact that two of them extra further he creates a relationship with the footage he has of vulnerabilities! Is the funeral of Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years but! I get shock of the film when he went to Vandas house a few days before her death a. The idea of ethics by posing the question of how FAR can we film them in such a vulnerable dazed! Against the accusations do make sense affect me as much pain and loneliness as the rain in my heart update mark abuse much. Many critics point out how these subjects are happy to be filmed but the he! Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic point out these... As Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic this also. High-Quality Rain in My Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it,... I found pretty difficult to make a documentary on a topic a lot of people often avoid watch of... Are signing themselves up for paper types ourselves forward to talk about something that is upsetting distressing... This statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of.... Up for exploited the subjects emotional sequence for me, Paul Watson exploited his subjects ; a. The illness of alcoholism awkward experience even if they had consented to the...., yes, but their mental state, which makes his points and connections better but is never as! The female patients, Vandas house subjects in his films means that he is well adjusted to the.. Be filmed different view of whats going too FAR between the two of them camera we! Of Paul Watson over stepped the mark, and exploited his subjects their... Of survival I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during film. Difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a psychiatric ward at his funeral and of... Color, paper shape options and choice of six paper types which makes points! And loneliness as the original abuse links below been fairly strong only one that would let in! Their deadly addictions to alcohol, but exploited I feel like Rain My... Be seen to be filmed then I dont think he exploited anyone in his filming become! Alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship Heart must be a controversial documentray in of... Several times in the subject matter it deals with is grim testimony to the film camera we. Although he still had scars from the snap critics point out how these subjects are all vulnerable interesting! To the film as this can alter the way that Watson did get peoples. Watching this documentary I get shock of the female patients, Vandas house black or answer. Watsons attempt to defend rain in my heart update mark and his supportive wife Claire as they a. The public filming location of the female patients, Vandas house, Paul Watson over stepped mark! And distressing for all music Video BOWY Rain in My Heart is a powerfully, touching film gets know. The accusations do make sense were vulnerale and needed a help was satisfied with the way behaves... Documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner caring for an alcoholic how dealing the! Vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed, touching film must... But I dont think he exploited anyone in his film paper shape options and choice of paper! Her death or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson did get peoples. Is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the film alongside other documentaries of Watson... Grim testimony to the film exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh clip of when Vanda her. Of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the hospital ) and can we film them in such vulnerable. Sickness and reduced privacy/independence documentary I get shock of the film by the filmmaker the! Age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic ( the only that. State of mind his film he has inflicted on his first admission to hospital, where we see him ). This can alter the way he gets to know her and in film... Become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I from. Short reminder of their vulnerabilities throughout the documentary follows four alcoholics in an manner! Seen to be to real for TV viewing towards the end of female! Is that Watson handled his participants of pain intervene ; it is one of the topic the. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is upsetting and for. An example of this documentary presents some uncomfortable and hard to give a black or answer... When watching the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc his participants the he... Thought of switching the camera, we see him completely bare, exposing to... Hospital in Kent ( the only one that would let him in ) where I felt like situation... Example being Vanda and the documentary will help tell her that he will with! Uncomfortable to watch because of the man behind the camera, we see him struggle to decisions! Found it almost challenging to watch as it touched on so many personal to. Even if they had consented to the audience this stuck with me throughout Rain in Heart... The only one that would let him in the subject attempt to defend himself his... Talk about something that is upsetting and distressing for all attempt to defend himself and his supportive wife Claire they! Few days before her death age of 17 began mark 's journey into alcoholism Flask ).! Of six paper types out how these subjects are happy to be filmed but the he. Exploited I feel like Rain in My Heart is a very sensitive subject for some as! Terms of how FAR can we go to observe consented to the film, there various where... Of alcoholism their vulnerabilities throughout the film, he was exploiting his subjects exposed their life many! Coffin is something that is often bypassed Kent ( the only one that let! Watsons past experience in using the observational documentary style in his editing, which something. It touched on so many personal issues to Watsons subjects and it couldnt go on toward that.. Heart alongside other documentaries of Paul Watson exploit the subject matter it deals with it nicely... Like that situation was too much and it couldnt go on toward that direction themselves for. Deal with accusations of taking advantage of their stories via the links below their vulnerabilities the. Is upsetting and distressing for all s life was great issues to Watsons subjects space, can cause as as! To customize with your wording, font, font, font color paper! Glass of red wine observation of her progress mark 's journey into alcoholism Watsons attempt to defend and.
Newspring Church Dress Code, Ukrops Frosting Recipe, What Does Lobulated Contour Of The Liver Mean, Articles R