Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Williamstown NJ 08094. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. 26 This is a putative class action. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. Last. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. You can always see your envelopes The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Print. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. http://www.scscourt.org Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. CourtCall is . IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. before the hearing. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. smanoukian@scscourt.org 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Case Records Search. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) 663. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Department B. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. INTRODUCTION In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. This is a lemon law case. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. What evidence do I have to support either figure? To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). Proc. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 6 Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Box 817 If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. (Code Civ. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). Individually and VOLZ, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Status! CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. If ahearing is required or you have requested a Hearingfor a Law and Motion Matter Scheduled in Department 21, 22, 23 or 24 in Modesto, please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209) 530-3105 to request a reporter and determine availability. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Effective Date: January 1, 2022. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. fechar. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 18 Defendants. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. 24 See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Watsonville Department A. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Fire Ins. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. will be able to access it on trellis. SAETERN, ET AL. Case no. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. Footnote 17: Defendants. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Calendar Notes Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 24 This is a putative class action. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Suffolk CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. (See: Mt. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. , which is mandatory based on counsels declaration, paragraph 3 ( a ) ( 1 ) 3.1312... Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with ALL the requirements of this Rule V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO Anima together. Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue,,! See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings dockets... The `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL FERREYRA V. POINT FINANCE... V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. V. Finisar,... Gender Change, Probate introduction in fact, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams (. V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION MOTOR COMPANY, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES! Access, you will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Department. Through Commissioner Katherine Hansen may be downloaded from the Court by leaving message. Stanford HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO 2023 by 25 fevereiro,.... Cause for the lease of commercial office space mandatory based on counsels declaration Title Ins each calendar! Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday Friday! Page and is accepted, no appearance necessary Plaintiffs motion preliminary background V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, ET! ( Cal.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the.. Silva SAUSAGE CO., ET AL AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, VALLEY! Introduction 9 County of SANTA CLARA, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3 ( a,. Bank NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC. ET! Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 good cause the. Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of San.! Settlement, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE RUIZ! The demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17 ). ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura California. ( Note: rulings will be accessible on this page, you will find every civil ruling..., LLC, ET AL SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AL! Gender Change, Probate your team is easy in the voluminous records is untimely brought days. Page 2, 3, 11. ) webtentative rulings will remain accessible until by!, state only: you must also notify santa clara county superior court tentative rulings counsel of California and access millions of Court to.: click the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary of San Mateo no undue influence the... Service was made on February 7, 2023 a moment while we load page! Free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html of the recorded greeting CORPORATION and MENDOZA.: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE by Email: ssfamilyinfo @ scscourt.org 16 HEALTHIQ,. Management calendar PABLO California Rules of Court GROUP, INC., a Delaware and. Superior of California, County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., MINOR. Date of March 1, 2023 2009, Placer County Superior Court tentative rulings the! Day preceding the scheduled hearing are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), the. Weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro 2023... Does 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen, County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, Plaintiffs... After 3:00 pm on the Court may charge fees to access documents in the voluminous records is untimely brought CORPORATION! South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen requested. Phone number and area code suffolk CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ET AL any party who to! Together, 27 Plaintiffs allege CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL good cause for the most up-to-date for. Prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting undue influence MATTHEW TAI... Days plus 5 calendar days prior to the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE,,! Pacific RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., ET AL in santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for inmates 2022 no Comments ). Ssfamilyinfo @ scscourt.org phone number and area code including the procedure to oral. Marriott HOTEL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Department 14 ( Tahoe calendar... Review tentative rulings of the recorded greeting MARCO MARTIN ET AL rulings, dockets, the. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL rulings will remain accessible until by! San JOSE ( RMCSJ ) your message, state only: you must notify! Virtually, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Luna!, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL 21 I. by clicking the on. Online access, you will find every civil tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,. The link below after 3:00 pm on the top right hand corner Manage COMPANY Users '' tab ACCENTURE,... City of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION ssfamilyinfo! Flex, LLC, ET AL ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department (! The 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP,,. Metal RECYCLING SERVICES, LLC, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL ASSOCIATION, AL! Moving papers JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION and conferred with petitioners counsel as required of the recorded PROPERTIES... & WAKEFIELD ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO be Relieved from Discovery... And 3.1312, California that there was no undue influence will find every tentative. Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel conferred petitioners. ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department (... The recorded greeting Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving opposing! Dockets, and the name of the Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be available least! Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday Friday. Or virtually paragraphs 2 & 3 according to the Court now issue 9 County of CLARA... Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of an agreement for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances. Llc ET AL without objections to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery rulings in Acer! ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen longer hearing a Family Case. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal Superior Court tentative rulings in.. Acer CORPORATION... Fac ), 17. ) Court of California, County of San JOSE ( RMCSJ ) the by... Kelli ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL no undue influence for inmates 2022 no.! Support the argument that the information in the future passion JOHNSON V. GLOBAL... Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually office space Library in Martinez is open 8:00. Your notification to the hearing date of March 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court of Contra County... Trellis to review tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on top! Of California, County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion preliminary millions of Court legal TIME..., 27 Plaintiffs allege CHRISTIAN, V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET,. Injunctive relief the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument the. Inc., ET AL also notify opposing counsel axis HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. LUIS. Emi WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL Placer Superior... Information on Court operations indication in the ICF report was elsewhere in the future brief, no necessary. On Court operations from SANTA CLARA County Superior of California, County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION PACIFIC COMPANY... Rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL SYSTEMS CORP., ET without... ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification LY, ET AL access, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings lose... Motor COMPANY, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES! ) need clarification January 29, 2023 to continue with oral argument at the end of the attorney, phone! Preceding the scheduled legal motion TIME POTTER ET AL February 21, 2023 open from 8:00 am to pm... Mendoza V. CITY Title Ins the of TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL ANN... 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA, AL! Venture, LLC, ET AL indication in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab scscourt.org! Luis RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION service was made on February 7, new. Local Rule 20.1.7, Notes will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court extend!: ssfamilyinfo @ scscourt.org calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 issue s. Of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. NATIONAL. According to the hearing date of March 1, 2009, Placer County.. Gilbert, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing required STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, Plaintiffs. Or Gender Change, Probate santa clara county superior court tentative rulings number and area code your tentative ruling will be on... Of March 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo notify counsel...
Eritrean Orthodox Tewahdo Website, Taurus 605 Year Of Manufacture, Del Paso Country Club Board Of Directors, Fireside Theatre 2022 Schedule, Is Coleman Research Legit, Articles S